Camil Kreit v. Acer Capital Group Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20198:15-cv-01881California703 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:15-cv-01881-CJC-KESx Date: September 13, 2019

Title: DR. CAMIL KREIT v. ACER CAPITAL GROUP INC., et al.

PRESENT:

THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Jazmin Dorado Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why Richard Woods Should Not Be Sanctioned for Failing to Appear for Judgment Debtor Examination

In June 2017, the Court entered a money judgment in favor of Plaintiff Camil Kreit (“Judgment Creditor”) and against Defendants including Richard Woods (“Judgment Debtor”). (Dkt. 67.) The judgment against Judgment Debtor was based on default. (Dkt. 37.) In May 2017, attorney Jaclyn Carney filed a “Notice of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information” identifying herself as counsel for all Defendants. (Dkt. 62.) She specifically identified herself as counsel of record for Richard Woods. (Dkt. 63.) She later…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.