Nationstar

Michael Culross v. Nationstar

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20192:19-cv-04101California2,564 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

JS-

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 MICHAEL CULROSS, an individual; Case №: 2:19-cv-04101-ODW (AGR) MAKI HIRANO, an individual, 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND [9]

v.

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC

15 dba MR. COOPER; BARRET DAFFIN, 16 FRAPPIER, TREDER & WEISS, LLP; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 I. INTRODUCTION On March 27, 2019, Plaintiffs Michael Culross and Maki Hirano (“Plaintiffs”) 21 filed this action alleging three causes of action for dual tracking, wrongful foreclosure, 22 and unfair business practices in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los 23 Angeles. (Notice of Removal Ex. 1 (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1-1.) Defendant Nationstar 24 Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper (“Nationstar”) removed this matter 25 based on federal diversity jurisdiction. (See Notice of Removal ¶ 3, ECF No. 1.) 26 Plaintiffs move to remand. (Mot. to Remand (“Mot.”), ECF No. 9.) For the reasons 27 that follow, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion and REMANDS this action to 28 1 state court.1 II. FACTUAL AND…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.