Fredrick Terence Harvey v. County of Riverside

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20195:19-cv-01453California1,805 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 5:19-cv-01453-DOC (SK) Date September 16, 2019 Title Fredrick Terence Harvey v. County of Riverside et al.

Present: The Honorable Steve Kim, U.S. Magistrate Judge Connie Chung n/a Deputy Clerk Court Smart / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff, a California state prisoner, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that numerous probation officers, police detectives, deputy sheriffs, and municipalities violated his constitutional rights in at least 10 incidents since 2015. (Compl., ECF 1 at 1-11). But because Plaintiff requests to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court must screen his complaint to “identify cognizable claims” and dismiss those that are “frivolous, malicious, or fail[] to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), (b)(1)-(2) (2018). As currently pled, Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.