KST Data, Inc. v. DXC Technology

background of this case is relatively complex, and the Court directs the parties to its prior order for a detailed summary of the dispute. (See Order on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 188.) In this prior order, the Court denied summary judgment to ES as to its breach of contract claim against KST and granted summary judgment to KST as to ES' breach of contract claim against KST. (Order on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment at 11.) The Court also found that ES had wrongfully stopped performing the KST-ES Contract because KST had not, in fact, breached the contract. (Order on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment at 10.) Accordingly, the Court granted summary judgment to KST as to KST's breach of contract claim against ES. (Order on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment at 15.) The Court subsequently entered judgment in favor of KST. (See Order Granting Judgment To KST, ECF No. 207.) The Court calculated the interest on the judgment amount as follows. "Because California law would permit an 18% interest rate to be charged, the Court applies a 18% pre-judgment interest on the amount of $3, 180,232.41. As KST specifies in its briefing, this interest…