Michael Brent v. The Boeing Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20192:17-cv-04429California8,523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 MICHAEL BRENT, Case No. 2:17-cv-04429-ODW (Ex) Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v.

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

THE BOEING COMPANY; and DOES JUDGMENT [55] 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Michael Brent (“Brent”), brings this action against Defendant, The 20 Boeing Company (“Boeing”), for various claims related to Boeing’s decision to not 21 promote Brent to an hourly lead position. Brent alleges six claims relating to alleged 22 racial discrimination and harassment. Pending before the Court is Boeing’s Motion 23 for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion”). 24 (ECF No. 55.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Boeing’s Motion.1 25 26

28 1 After considering the papers filed in connection with this Motion, the Court deemed this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Boeing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.