William J. Richards v. County of San Bernardino

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20195:17-cv-00497California470 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM J. RICHARDS, Case No. 5:17-cv-00497-SJO-SP Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

v. District Judge: Hon. S. James Otero

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,

MARK NOURSE, NORMAN

PARENT, TOM BRADFORD, JOHN

NAVARRO, DANIEL GREGONIS,

NORMAN SPERBER, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, 17 Defendants.

19 Defendants Daniel Gregonis, Norman Sperber, Tom Bradford, John Navarro, Mark Nourse, Norman Parent, and County of San Bernardino’s motions for summary judgment, or in the alternative partial summary judgment brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, on the Complaint of Plaintiff William J. Richards (“Plaintiff”), came on regularly before the Honorable S. James Otero for hearing on August 26, 2019. Susan Coleman appeared for Defendants, and attorneys Caitlin Weisberg and Marilyn Bednarski appeared for Plaintiff. The Court having read and duly considered the moving, opposing, and reply documents, and having duly considered all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.