Karl Bohee v. Clinton Harrell
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. CV 19-4990-GW (KS) Date: September 23, 2019 Title Karl Bohee v. Clinton Harrell et al
Present: The Honorable: Karen L. Stevenson, United States Magistrate Judge
Gay Roberson Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL
On June 7, 2019, Plaintiff, a California resident proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 1983 (“Complaint”). (Dkt. No. 1.) On June 11, 2019, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file proof of service within 90 days of filing the Complaint – that is, no later than September 5, 2019 (Dkt. No. 6), and on June 20, 2019, the Clerk issued the summons (Dkt. No. 7). Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states: “If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court – on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff – must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause…