Anita Hull v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20192:18-cv-02078California5,468 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANITA H., ) Case No. CV 18-2078-SP ) Plaintiff, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND v. ) ORDER ) ) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of ) Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) 18 I. INTRODUCTION On March 13, 2018, plaintiff Anita H. filed a complaint against defendant, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), seeking a review of a denial of period of disability, disability insurance benefits (“DIB”), and supplemental security income (“SSI”). Both parties have consented to proceed for all purposes before the assigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The court deems the matter suitable for adjudication without oral argument. Plaintiff presents two main issues for decision: (1) whether the 28 Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) residual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.