Natashad D. Dunbar v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20192:18-cv-05157California4,128 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATASHA D., ) Case No. CV 18-5157-SP ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ) ORDER ) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of ) Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) 18 I. INTRODUCTION On June 11, 2018, plaintiff Natasha D. filed a complaint against defendant, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), seeking a review of a denial of a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). The parties have fully briefed the matters in dispute, and the court deems the matter suitable for adjudication without oral argument. Plaintiff presents three disputed issues for decision: (1) whether the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred at step two when he found plaintiff only 28 suffered from a severe impairment in one knee; (2)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.