John J. Cannell, M.D. v. Aurora Las Encinas Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20192:19-cv-05042California899 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Case No. CV 19-5042 PA (MRW) JOHNJ.CANNELL,M.D.,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Petitioner, WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. AURORA LAS ENCINAS

HOSPITAL,

17 Respondent. 18 19 The Court dismisses this action without prejudice due to the failure of a 20 pro se litigant to update his address with the Court. 21 * * * 22 1. This is a habeas action involving an individual in a local psychiatric 23 hospital. Petitioner apparently seeks to challenge the basis for his stay in the 24 facility. (Docket # 2.) (Petitioner originally filed the action in the Ninth Circuit, 25 which transferred the matter to the district court for consideration. (Docket # 1.)) 26 2. Magistrate Judge Wilner screened the petition pursuant to local 27 practice and Habeas Rule 4. Judge Wilner preliminarily concluded that the habeas 28 petition presented no cognizable claim for federal habeas relief. Petitioner was ordered to show cause why the action should not be dismissed on that ground. (Docket # 4.) A copy of the Court’s order was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.