Liqin Xu v. Matthew Chan

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20192:19-cv-06950California1,739 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 LIQIN XU, Case No. 2:19-cv-06950-JLS-JC

Plaintiff, v.

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

AND ACTION MATTHEW CHAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 17 On August 9, 2019, plaintiff Liqin Xu, who is on an immigration bond, is proceeding pro se, and has paid the full filing fee, filed a “Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983” (“Complaint”) against three federal government attorneys who apparently have represented the United States in plaintiff’s immigration and removal proceedings and a related appeal. (Docket No. 1; Complaint at 1, 3). Plaintiff appears to sue all three defendants in their official capacities only, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”), and alleges that /// 26 27 1Plaintiff concurrently filed an Ex Parte Application for Emergency Stay of Removal (“Ex Parte App.”), which this Court denied on August 13, 2019. (Docket Nos. 5-7, 12). they all acted under color of federal law. (Complaint at 3).2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.