Liqin Xu v. Matthew Chan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 LIQIN XU, Case No. 2:19-cv-06950-JLS-JC
Plaintiff, v.
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT
AND ACTION MATTHEW CHAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 17 On August 9, 2019, plaintiff Liqin Xu, who is on an immigration bond, is proceeding pro se, and has paid the full filing fee, filed a “Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983” (“Complaint”) against three federal government attorneys who apparently have represented the United States in plaintiff’s immigration and removal proceedings and a related appeal. (Docket No. 1; Complaint at 1, 3). Plaintiff appears to sue all three defendants in their official capacities only, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”), and alleges that /// 26 27 1Plaintiff concurrently filed an Ex Parte Application for Emergency Stay of Removal (“Ex Parte App.”), which this Court denied on August 13, 2019. (Docket Nos. 5-7, 12). they all acted under color of federal law. (Complaint at 3).2 …