Paul Kinney v. Steven Langford
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL KINNEY, Case No. 2:18-cv-01995-SVW (MAA) Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS ANI v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN LANGFORD et ai., Defendants. 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint (ECF No. 19 || 1), Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 39), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF No. 20 || 41), Defendants’ Reply (ECF No. 51), the other records on file herein, and the 21 || Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 58). The 22 || time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been made. The Court 23 || concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; 2. …