Nathan Kogen v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20192:18-cv-03518California8,923 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN K., ) Case No. CV 18-3518-JPR 11 ) Plaintiff, ) 12 ) MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. ) AFFIRMING COMMISSIONER 13 ) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner ) 14 of Social Security, ) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 ) 17 I. PROCEEDINGS Plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying his application for Social Security disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation, filed August 27, 24 1 Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in compliance with 25 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 27 2 Andrew Saul is substituted in as the correct Defendant. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). 1 2019, which the Court has taken under submission without oral argument. For the reasons stated below, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.