Chase Hamano v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20192:19-cv-03788California5,414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 CHASE HAMANO, Individually and on ) Case No. 2:19-cv-03788-SVW-AFMx Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, ) ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE vs. ) ORDER1 ) ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

This Stipulated Protective Order is based substantially on the model protective order provided under Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon’s Procedures. 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.