Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd v. Bed Bath and Beyond, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20192:18-cv-03837California9,551 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

whe ESP Ba PN OZ RE WEA Enter Closed _

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL JS-5/JS- —

Scan Only _ CASE NO.: CV 2:18-3837 SJO (SKx) DATE: September 27, 2019 TITLE: Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd., et al. v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE S. JAMES OTERO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Victor Paul Cruz Not Present Courtroom Clerk Court Reporter

COUNSEL PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: COUNSEL PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS (in chambers): CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. and Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (together, "SSC" or "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. ("BB&B" or "Defendant") have filed claim construction briefs in which they ask the Court to construe nine (9) disputed phrases found in six of the patents asserted in this litigation: U.S. Patent No. 6,942,731 ("the '731 Patent"), U.S. Patent No. 7,982,207 ("the '207 Patent"), U.S. Patent No. 8,120,054 ("the '054 Patent"), U.S. Patent No. 8,168,988 ("the '988 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.