Canon Inc. v. V4INK, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Compl.,” Dkt. No. 1.) alleges seven causes of action for patent infringement, and specifically for infringement of: (1) U.S. Patent No. 8,588,646 B2 (“the ’646 Patent”); (2) U.S. Patent No. 7,869,740 B2 (“the ’740 Patent”); (3) U.S. Patent No. 8,165,494 B2 (“the ’494 Patent”); (4) U.S. Patent No. 8,971,760 B2 (“the ’760 Patent”); (5) U.S. Patent No. 9,494,916 B2 (“the ’916 Patent”); (6) U.S. Patent No. 9,857,763 B2 (“the ’763 Patent”); and (7) U.S. Patent No. 10,162,304 B2 (“the ’304 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”). (Compl. ¶¶ 21-22, 30-31,39-40,48-49,57-58, 66-67, 75-76.)
Plaintiff is a Japanese corporation. (Id. ¶ 1.) Plaintiff asserts that it is a “leading innovator, manufacturer, and seller of a wide variety of laser beam printers, inkjet printers, copying machines, cameras, and other consumer business, and industrial products.” (Id. ¶ 2.) According to the Complaint, Defendant is a California corporation with a principal place of business in Ontario, California that conducts business at least through its website v4ink.com. (Id. ¶¶ 3-4, 6.) All of the Asserted Patents describe and claim different aspects of…