Aaron Kirkpatrick v. W. L. Muniz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON KIRKPATRICK, ) No. CV 17-08917-CAS (AGR) ) Petitioner, ) ) AMENDED ORDER ACCEPTING ) FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

T. FOSS, Warden, )

) Respondent. ) ) 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file, including 19 the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Report and 20 Recommendation (“Report”) of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the 21 Objections filed by Petitioner. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of 22 those portions of the Report to which objections were made. The Court agrees with 23 the Report. 24 In his objections, Petitioner argues that the First Amended Petition is not 25 barred by the one-year statute of limitations under the AEDPA because the Superior 26 Court recently denied a petition…