Priscilla Dinh v. Victoria's Secret

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20195:18-cv-01891California427 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 18-1891 JGB (KKx) Date October 4, 2019 Title Priscilla Dinh v Victoria's Secret

Present: The Honorable JESUS G. BERNAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

MAYNOR GALVEZ Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: Order REMANDING Case to State Court. On June 12, 2018, Plaintiff Priscilla Dinh filed this action in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino. (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1-1, Exhibit A.) The Complaint brings causes of action for: (1) premises liability and (2) general negligence. (See id.) On September 5, 2018, Defendant Victoria’s Secret removed the case to this Court. (“Notice of Removal,” Dkt. No. 1.) The Notice of Removal states that the parties are diverse: Plaintiff is a citizen of California and Defendant is a Delaware limited liability company with a principal place of business in Ohio. (Id. ¶¶ 6,7.) The Notice of Removal also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.