Marcos Martinez-Sanchez v. Kirstjen Nielsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20195:18-cv-02592California809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11} MARCOS TULIO MARTINEZ- Case No. 5:18-cv-02592-JGB-JC

SANCHEZ,

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

V. RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

15] KEVIN MCALEENAN, Acting JUDGE Secretary of the Department o 16 || Homeland Security, et al., 17 Respondents. 18 19, Hao 20 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Petition”) and all of the records herein, including the August 23, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation’), respondents’ objections thereto filed on September 12, 2019, % petitioner’s partial objections thereto filed on September 12, 2019, and petitioner’s 77 Tesponse to respondents’ objections filed on September 23, 2019. The Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.