Blvd 6200 Owner South, LLC v. Kenneth Nelson

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20192:19-cv-08453California1,145 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

2 3 4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASE NUMBER:

Blvd 6200 Owner South, LLC., CV 19-8453 CAS (MRW) Plaintiff v.

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

Kenneth Nelson et al., STATE COURT 15 Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 County of L o s A n g e l e s for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.’” 21 Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of 23 removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v. Bank of 24 Am. Corp., 672 F.3d 661, 667 (9th Cir. 2012); Gaus v. Miles, Inc., 980 F.2d 564, 566 (9th Cir. 1992). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.