Michele Ammons v. Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.

O

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 MICHELLE AMMONS, Case № 2:18-cv-06489-ODW (MAAx) Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v.

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

DIVERSIFIED ADJUSTMENT

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

SERVICE, INC.,

JUDGMENT [38] Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Michelle Ammons (“Ammons”) sued Defendant Diversified 19 Adjustment Service, Inc. (“DAS”) for claims arising from DAS’s debt collection 20 activities. (See generally Compl., ECF No. 1.) Now before the Court is DAS’s 21 Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion”). (Mot., 22 ECF No. 38.) For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS IN PART and 23 DENIES IN PART Defendant’s Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND This case concerns Ammons’s delinquent Sprint account and DAS’s attempts to 26 collect the debt. On November 9, 2017, Sprint placed Ammons’s delinquent account

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in…