Felipe Gonzalez v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20192:17-cv-09310California4,091 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4

7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California

10 11 FELIPE GONZALEZ, Case No. 2:17-cv-09310-ODW(ASx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS

v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. et. ASSOCIATION, AND NDEX WEST 15 al., LCC MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST

Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT [64] [68] 17 I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, 20 N.A.’s (“Chase”), Federal National Mortgage Association’s (“Fannie Mae”), and 21 NDeX West LCC’s (“NDeX”) Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended 22 Complaint. (ECF Nos. 64, 68.) For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS 23 Defendants’ Motions.1 II. BACKGROUND On September 20, 2018 Plaintiff Felipe Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) filed his First 26 27 1 After carefully considering the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.