Board of Trustees of the Cement Masons Southern California Health and Welfare Fund v. Max Out, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20192:18-cv-09534California1,765 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CASE NO. 2:18-cv-09534-JAK-E 11 | CEMENT MASONS SOUTHERN 12| WETEARSIOND posits >

OF TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT ORDER RE CONTEMPT

13 | MASONS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

PENSION TRUST; BOARD OF

14 | TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT

MASONS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

15 | INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT

ACCOUNT (DEFINED

16 | CONTRIBU ION) TRUST, BOARD

OF TRUSTEES OF THE ELEVEN

17 | COUNTIES CEMENT MASONS

VACATION SAVINGS PLAN;

18 | BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE

CEMENT MASONS JOINT

19 | APPRENTICESHIP TRUST, 20 Plaintiffs, 21] y. 22 | MAX OUT, INC., a Nevada corporation, 23 Defendant. 25 26 27 28

1 On August 14, 2019, an Order to Show Cause re: Contempt (“OSC’’) (Dkt. 2 | 27) issued that required Defendant, Max Out, Inc. (“Max Out’), and Roderick 3 || Delton Edison (“Edison”), an agent and principal officer of Max Out, to show 4 | cause why either or both should not be held in contempt for failing to comply with 5 | the May 2, 2019 Order that required an accounting. Dkt. 19.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.