Diana Helen Diaz v. Nancy A. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIANA D., Case No. 5:18-cv-01996-GJS

Plaintiff

v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,2 15 Defendant.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Diana D. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties consented to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge and filed briefs addressing the disputed issues in this case. [Dkt. 17 (“Pl. Br.”), Dkt. 21 (“Def. Br.”), Dkt. 22 (“Reply”).] The Court has taken the parties’ briefing under submission without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, the Court

In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party in this case. 27 Andrew M. Saul, now…