Samuel Love v. 2610 Lychee, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20195:18-cv-00521California679 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAMUEL LOVE, CV 18-0521 DSF (KKx) Plaintiff,

v. Order to Show Cause re Supplemental Jurisdiction 2610 LYCHEE, LLC, and

BERONICA LILIANA

CERVANTES,

Defendants.

Plaintiff Samuel Love has asserted claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Unruh Act against Defendants 2610 Lychee, LLC, and Beronica Cervantes. Dkt. 1 (Compl.). The Complaint seeks injunctive relief under the ADA and “actual damages and a statutory minimum of $4,000” pursuant to §§ 55.56(a)-(c) of the Unruh Act. Id. at 8. On September 30, 2019, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment against Defendant 2610 Lychee. Dkt. 36 (Order). In its Order, the Court indicated that it would require Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim. Id. at 6 n.3. The supplemental jurisdiction statute “reflects the understanding that, when deciding whether to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, ‘a federal court should consider and weigh in each case, and at every stage of the litigation, the values of judicial economy, convenience,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.