Everett O'Neal Allen v. A. Koenig

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20192:19-cv-08475California2,059 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”) filed by Everett O’Neal Allen (“Petitioner”), a California state prisoner. [Dkt. No. 1]. The Court’s review of the Petition, the Court’s own records, and public records reveals that the Petition appears to be untimely and that at least one of Petitioner’s grounds for relief is unexhausted. For the reasons discussed below, Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by November 14, 2019 why: (1) the instant Petition should not be dismissed with prejudice because it is time- barred; and (2) whether Petitioner’s third ground for relief is unexhausted.

II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT

Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, this court is required to conduct a preliminary review of all petitions for writ of habeas corpus filed by state prisoners. Pursuant to Rule 4, this court must summarily dismiss a petition if it “plainly

1 Where necessary, the Court takes judicial notice of the public records. See Fed. R. Evid. 201(b)(2) (“The court may judicially notice a fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it . . . can be accurately…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.