Rafael G. Delgado v. Roselynn L. Hickok

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20195:19-cv-01951California1,150 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

J S 7

ERK, 1, T OORT

CLE 0 10/15/2019 € a “CW Tore □□□

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 EDCV 19-01951-FMO (KKx) Plaintiff v. || ROSELYNN L. HICKOK, ET AL.,

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

STATE COURT Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 || County of San Bernardino for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 || Alexander, 246 U.S. 276,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.