Raul Cervantes Valenzuela v. V. Torres

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20192:19-cv-07559California3,932 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 RAUL CERVANTES VALENZUELA, Case No. CV 19-7559-CJC (KK) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

V. TORRES, ET AL., Defendants. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Raul Cervantes Valenzuela (“Plaintiff” or “Cervantes”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). As discussed below, the Court dismisses the Complaint with leave to amend. II. ALLEGATIONS IN THE COMPLAINT On August 29, 2019, Cervantes, currently an inmate at California State Prison – Los Angeles County in Lancaster, California (“CSP-LAC”), constructively filed1 a 27 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se inmate gives prison authorities a complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant to Section 1983 and the ADA against defendants V. Torres, D. Moisa, and Sgt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.