Carlos Joe Espinosa v. G. Marshall

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20192:19-cv-02468California326 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:19-cv-02468-SK Date October 18, 2019 Title Carlos Joe Espinosa v. G. Marshall

Present: The Honorable Steve Kim, U.S. Magistrate Judge Connie Chung n/a Deputy Clerk Court Smart / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None present None present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: OPPOSITION TO

MOTION TO DISMISS

On April 2, 2019, Petitioner filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his 2015 conviction and sentence for assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury, petty theft, and battery with serious bodily injury. (ECF 1). On August 29, 2019, Respondent moved to dismiss the Petition for untimeliness. (ECF 18). Petitioner’s opposition was due September 28, 2019 (ECF at 2), but none has been filed as of today. Failure to oppose a motion to dismiss may be deemed consent to the granting of the motion. See L.R. 7-12. Petitioner also bears the burden to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.