Aracely Lara Saldivar v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20192:19-cv-06393California1,849 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

JS-

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 ARACELY LARA SALDIVAR et al. Case № 2:19-cv-06393-ODW (JPRx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND and DENYING FEES AND 14 FCA US LLC et al., COSTS [21]; and

DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants.

AS MOOT [16]

16 I. INTRODUCTION On June 6, 2019, Plaintiffs Aracely Lara Saldivar and Sandra Alvarado 19 (“Plaintiffs”) filed this action in the Superior Court of California, County of Los 20 Angeles. (Notice of Removal (“Notice”) ¶ 1, Ex. A (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1.) 21 Defendants FCA US LLC (“FCA”) and McPeek’s Dodge of Anaheim (“McPeek’s”) 22 (collectively, “Defendants”) removed the matter based on alleged diversity 23 jurisdiction. (Notice ¶ 8.) Plaintiffs move to remand and seek attorneys’ fees and 24 costs. (Mot. to Remand (“Mot.”), ECF No. 21.) The Court finds that it lacks subject 25 matter jurisdiction and consequently REMANDS this action to state court.1 26

28 1 After considering the papers filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.