Enrique Quiles v. The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20192:19-cv-06825California989 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:19-cv-06825-AB-JPR ENRIQUE QUILES,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND, DENYING REQUEST

FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES, AND

Plaintiff, DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION

v.

THE TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL

COMPANY LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP;

SERVICEMASTER GLOBAL

HOLDINGS, INC.;

AETNA HEALTH AND LIFE

INSURANCE COMPANY;

TODD RUSHWORTH, an individual; SILVIA BARBOSA, an individual; and 21 DOES 1-100, inclusive, 22 Defendants.

24 Before the Court is Plaintiff Enrique Quiles’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to remand 25 this action to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles and request for 26 attorney’s fees and sanctions in the amount of $15,400 plus costs, (Dkt. No. 10), and 27 Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. (Dkt. No. 11). Defendants filed an 28 opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to remand, (Dkt. No. 13), and Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion to compel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.