Enrique Quiles v. The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20192:19-cv-06825California989 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No. 2:19-cv-06825-AB-JPR ENRIQUE QUILES,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
REMAND, DENYING REQUEST
FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES, AND
Plaintiff, DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION
v.
THE TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL
COMPANY LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP;
SERVICEMASTER GLOBAL
HOLDINGS, INC.;
AETNA HEALTH AND LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY;
TODD RUSHWORTH, an individual; SILVIA BARBOSA, an individual; and 21 DOES 1-100, inclusive, 22 Defendants.
24 Before the Court is Plaintiff Enrique Quiles’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to remand 25 this action to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles and request for 26 attorney’s fees and sanctions in the amount of $15,400 plus costs, (Dkt. No. 10), and 27 Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. (Dkt. No. 11). Defendants filed an 28 opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to remand, (Dkt. No. 13), and Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion to compel…