Aaron Raiser v. City of Murrieta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AARON RAISER, EDCV 19-0183 DSF (KK)

Plaintiff,

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF

v. AARON RAISER SHOW

CAUSE WHY HE SHOULD

CITY OF MURRIETA, et al., NOT BE REQUIRED TO SEEK Defendants. COURT PERMISSION

BEFORE NAMING AS A

DEFENDANT ANY JUDGE

OR COURT STAFF OF ANY

COURT AND BEFORE

MOVING TO RECUSE ANY

JUDGE PRESIDING OVER A

CASE TO WHICH PLAINTIFF

IS A PARTY OR TO WHOM A

MOTION TO RECUSE SUCH

A JUDGE HAS BEEN

ASSIGNED

The Court has described some of the history of Plaintiff Aaron Raiser’s litigation in this and other courts in its September 9, 2019 Order Declining to Disqualify as Presiding Judge (9/9/19 Order). See Dkt. 67. As is apparent from the Attachment to that Order (9/9/19 Attachment) and the docket of the Central District, Mr. Raiser has made a habit of naming and moving to recuse1 judges

1 “Recusal” is often used to mean withdrawal on the judge’s own initiative as contrasted with “disqualification,” which is used to refer to a request by a of this district (including a judge from another district appointed by the Chief Judge of the Ninth Circuit to preside…