MG Marquee Apartments, LP v. Nicole Bridges
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
JS-6 2 3 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MG MARQUEE APARTMENTS, LP, CASE NUMBER:
10 1l CV 19-8913-RGK (JEMx) Plaintiff V. 13 || NICOLE BRIDGES, et al.,
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO
STATE COURT 1S Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced ina state 20 || court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. 22 || Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of 23 || removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v. Bank of Am. Corp., 672…