Consuelo M. Fuerte v. Nancy A. Berryhill
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20195:18-cv-02648California3,197 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CONSUELO F.,
Case No. EDCV 18-cv-02648-GJS Plaintiff 12 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of ORDER Social Security,2 Defendant.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Consuelo F. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 11 and 12] and briefs [Dkt. 18 (“Pl. Br.”), Dkt. 19 (“Def. Br.”)] addressing disputed issues in the case. Plaintiff also filed a Statement of No Reply. [Dkt. 20.] The matter is now ready for
25 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party in this case.