Consuelo M. Fuerte v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20195:18-cv-02648California3,197 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CONSUELO F.,

Case No. EDCV 18-cv-02648-GJS Plaintiff 12 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of ORDER Social Security,2 Defendant.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Consuelo F. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The parties filed consents to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 11 and 12] and briefs [Dkt. 18 (“Pl. Br.”), Dkt. 19 (“Def. Br.”)] addressing disputed issues in the case. Plaintiff also filed a Statement of No Reply. [Dkt. 20.] The matter is now ready for

25 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party in this case.

Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner of Social Security and is automatically…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.