Mark Charles Hanson v. Andrew Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
a 2 3 4 5 6 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARK CHARLES HANSON, Case No. 2:19-cv-08425-FMO.(MAA) Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
¥. 15 Commnissoner of Sacial Security, Defendant. ‘18 19 On September 30, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendant. 21 pursuant to various provisions of the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff 22 seeks an:award of disability benefits from the Social Security Cormissioner on two 23 || apparent grounds: for'a neurological disorder (id. at 6) and as a remedy for past. 24 || racial discrimination he experienced in job hiting (id. at 8). The Court orders 25 || Plaintiff to show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed without 26 || prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The existence of federal subject matter jurisdiction must be presented on the 28 || face of a properly pleaded complaint. See Rivet v. Regions Bank of Louisiana, 522
US. 470, 475 (1998). “A claimant's failure:to exhaust the procedures set:forth in 2 || the Social…