Tremayne Carroll v. Jared Lozano
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TREMAYNE CARROLL, ) CASE NO. CV 19-8519-SJO (PJW) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION ) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED v. ) ) WARDEN JARED LOZANO, ET AL., ) ) Respondents. ) ) 15 On September 27, 2019, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his 1999 state conviction and life sentence as well as the conditions of his confinement. From the face of the Petition, it appears that his claims are either unexhausted or not cognizable in federal habeas corpus proceedings. As such, absent further explanation from Petitioner, the Petition will be dismissed, as follows. In his fifth and sixth claims, Petitioner contends that the prison’s monitoring of interactions between him and medical staff 25 In 2017, Petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the state court’s denial of his petition for resentencing pursuant to 27 state…