Katie Lynn Hawn v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20192:19-cv-05540California708 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Case No. CV 19-5540 MWF (MRW) KATIE LYNN HAWN,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Petitioner,

WITH PREJUDICE

v.

FRCP

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

19 The Court dismisses this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 20 Procedure 41 for failure to prosecute. 21 * * * 22 1. This is a habeas action involving a state criminal judgment 23 case. A state jury convicted Petitioner of battery and resisting arrest 24 following an altercation at Hearst Castle. Petitioner filed a habeas petition 25 in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging that conviction. 26 2. Magistrate Judge Wilner screened the petition pursuant to 27 local practice and Habeas Rule 4. Judge Wilner preliminarily concluded 28 that the habeas petition contained unexhausted claims and did not clearly present cognizable claims for federal habeas relief. (Docket # 3.) Judge Wilner ordered Petitioner to respond with information regarding how she intended to proceed with her unexhausted claims. The order also required…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.