Daniel Ray Bennett v. L. J. Milusnic

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL RAY BENNETT, Case No. 2:19-cv-04983-FMO-MAA

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

THE UNITED STATES

L.J. MILUSNIC, Warden, MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“R&R,” ECF No. 11). The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s objections to the Report and Recommendation. (“Objections,” ECF No. 12.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner specifically has objected. The Objections reiterate arguments made in Petitioner’s substantive response (see generally ECF No. 9), and they lack merit for the reasons set forth in the R&R. Below, the Court briefly addresses arguments raised for the first time in the Objections. …