Shane Investments Group, LLC v. Greater Metropolitan Missionary Baptist Church of Los Angeles, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20192:19-cv-08758California1,226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHANE INVESTMENTS GROUP, LLC., CASE NUMBER:

10 CV 19-8758-GW (AGRx) Plaintiff v. 13 || GREATER METROPOLITAN 14 || MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH OF ORDER REMANDING CASE TO LOS ANGELES, et al., STATE COURT Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great N. Ry. Co. v. Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Generally, where Congress has acted to create a right of removal, those statutes are strictly construed against removal jurisdiction. Id.; Nevada v. Bank of 24 || Am. Corp. 672 F.3d 661, 667 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.