Valley Surgical Center LLC v. County of Los Angeles

1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VALLEY SURGICAL CENTER LLC., ) Case No. CV 13-02265 DDP (AGRx) a California Limited ) Liability Company, ) ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiff, ) MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ) v. ) ) [Dkts 483, 492] COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a ) government entity, et al., ) 16 Defendants. 17 18 Presently before the court are two motions for summary 19 judgment, one filed by Defendant Selma Calmes and the other filed 20 by Defendants Lakshmanan Sathyavagiswaran, Adrian Marinovich, Raffi 21 Djabourian, Denis C. Astarita, John Kades, and Ed Winter. Having 22 considered the submissions of the parties and heard oral argument, 23 the court grants the motions and adopts the following Order.

I. Legal Standard

25 Summary judgment is appropriate where the pleadings, 26 depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, 27 together with the affidavits, if any, show “that there is no 28 genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as …