Scheerlinck

Scheerlinck v. Orange County Sheriff's Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20198:16-cv-01012California348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 PETER SCHEERLINCK, ) No. SA CV 16-1012-JVS (PLA) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, ) CONCLUSIONS, AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DPET., ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) On October 8, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R” (ECF No. 142)), recommending that the action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and to follow court orders and noting that plaintiff had not communicated with the Court since September 13, 2018. (R&R at 3). Since that date, on October 21, 2019, and October 23, 2019, mail from the Court addressed to plaintiff at his address of record has been returned as “Not Deliverable”/“Unable to Forward.” (ECF Nos. 143, 144). Failure to inform the Court of a change of address during the pendency…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.