Connie Dietrich v. Autozone West, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20192:19-cv-04291California7,441 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. LA CV19-04291 JAK (PJWx) Date October 28, 2019 Title Connie Dietrich v. Autozone West, Inc., et al.

Present: The Honorable JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Andrea Keifer Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND FOR

LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION (DKT. 32)

lL. Introduction On October 11, 2011, Connie Dietrich (“Plaintiff,” or “Connie”!) brought this action in the Los Angeles Superior Court. Dkt. 1-1 at 10. The Complaint names the following defendants: Autozone West, Inc. (“Autozone”); Borgwarner Morse TEC LLC (“Borgwarner”); Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”); Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc. (“Kelly-Moore”); Masoneilan International Inc. (“Masoneilan”); Metalclad Insulation LLC (“Metalclad”); Owens-lllinois, Inc. (“Owens”);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.