Christopher Barrett Smith v. City of Santa Barbara
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20192:19-cv-04366California954 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. CV 19-4366 VAP (SS) Date: November 4, 2019 Page 1 of
Title: Christopher Barrett Smith v. City of Santa Barbara, et al.
DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT ANY
SURVIVING CLAIMS AGAINST THE DOE DEFENDANTS
BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(m)
PRESENT:
HONORABLE SUZANNE H. SEGAL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
_Marlene Ramirez_ _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No.
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)
On March 21, 2019, Plaintiff, a California resident proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in the Santa Barbara County Superior Court raising claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state statutory and common law. The Complaint sued the City of Santa Barbara; the Santa Barbara Police Department (“SBPD”); SBPD Chief Lori Luhnow; SBPD Officers Christina Ortega and Thomas Vaneyck (collectively, the…