Dawana Brady v. Michael Leahy

JS-

CLERK, US: DISTRICT COURT er Moye CW__pnrory 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DAWNA BRADY, ) Case No. ED CV 19-1905 FMO (SPx) Plaintiff, V. ORDER REMANDING ACTION 13 MICHAEL LEAHY, et al., Defendants. 15 On September 3, 2019, plaintiff Dawna Brady (‘plaintiff’), filed a Complaint in the Riverside 17 || County Superior Court against defendants Michael Leahy, Xudle, Inc. (“Xudle”), Xudle Software, 18] LLC (“Xudle Software”), and Fullsteam Holdings, LLC (“Fullsteam”), (collectively, “defendants”). 19|| (See Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”) at J 1). On October 4, 2019, defendants Xudle Software 20] and Fullsteam removed that action on diversity jurisdiction grounds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. 21] (See id. at J 9). “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power…