Denise O. Zabala v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20192:18-cv-02032California2,828 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISION

DENISE Z., Case No. CV 18-02032-DFM

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff, AND ORDER

v.

ANDREW M. SAUL,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Plaintiff Denise Z. (“Plaintiff”) appeals from the final decision of the Social Security Commissioner denying her applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”).1 For the reasons set forth below, the Commissioner’s decision is reversed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. I.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff filed applications for DIB and SSI on September 2, 2014, alleging disability beginning November 11, 2011. See Dkt. 16, Administrative

1 The Court partially redacts Plaintiff’s name in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Record (“AR”) 170-82. Plaintiff’s initial application was denied on February 5, 2015. See AR 106-10. Plaintiff requested a hearing before an ALJ on March 5, 2015. See AR 116-17. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.