The Garmon Corporation v. HealthyPets, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20195:18-cv-00809California1,647 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

3

7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California

9

11 THE GARMON CORPORATION, Case №. 5:18-cv-00809-ODW (SHKx)

Plaintiff,

AMENDED ORDER DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST

14 HEALTHYPETS, INC., ET AL, AMENDED COMPLAINT [110];

AND DENYING

Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND

THE SCHEDULING ORDER [123]

16 17 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff The Garmon Corporation’s (“Garmon”) Motion for 20 Leave to File a First Amended Complaint. (Mot. to Amend Compl. (“Mot.”), ECF 21 No. 110.) Garmon seeks to amend its Complaint to re-allege its voluntarily dismissed 22 copyright infringement claim. However, because Garmon does not meet the requisite 23 “good cause” standard for modifying the scheduling order to allow amendment at this 24 stage of the litigation, the Court DENIES Garmon’s Motion. (ECF No. 110.) 25 26 27 1 After considering the papers filed by the parties, the Court deems the matter appropriate for 28 decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.