Fredrick Terence Harvey v. County of Riverside

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 5, 20195:19-cv-01453California532 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FREDRICK TERENCE HARVEY, CASE NO. 5:19-cv-01453-DOC (SK)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

v. FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE et al.,

Defendants. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that numerous probation officers, police detectives, deputy sheriffs, and municipalities violated his constitutional rights in at least ten incidents since 2015. (ECF 1). In September 2019, the Court screened the complaint and found it deficient under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF 6). The Court thus ordered Plaintiff to show cause why his in forma pauperis application should not be denied and this action dismissed because of the legal and factual deficiencies outlined in the order to show cause. (Id. at 3). Alternatively, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend his complaint by no later than October 16, 2019. (Id. at 4). The Court warned Plaintiff that if he did not timely file either an amended complaint or other response to the order to show cause, this action would be involuntarily dismissed for lack of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.