Jesse Plasola v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20192:19-cv-05592California1,315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 19-5592 JAK (SS) Date: November 8, 2019 Page 1 of

Title: Jesse Plasola v. State of California, et al.

DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT DEFENDANT

ROGER HUBBARD BE DISMISSED BECAUSE HE IS NOT

A STATE ACTOR

PRESENT:

HONORABLE SUZANNE H. SEGAL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

_Marlene Ramirez_ _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No.

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

On June 27, 2019, Plaintiff Jesse Plasola, a California resident proceeding pro se but not in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to U.S.C. § 1983. (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1). The claims arise from Plaintiff’s California divorce proceedings in 2006, and, more specifically, from Plaintiff’s efforts a decade later to modify the Dissolution Order governing the division of the couple’s marital property. The Complaint sues five…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.