Jesse Plasola v. State of California
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20192:19-cv-05592California1,315 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. CV 19-5592 JAK (SS) Date: November 8, 2019 Page 1 of
Title: Jesse Plasola v. State of California, et al.
DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT DEFENDANT
ROGER HUBBARD BE DISMISSED BECAUSE HE IS NOT
A STATE ACTOR
PRESENT:
HONORABLE SUZANNE H. SEGAL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
_Marlene Ramirez_ _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No.
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)
On June 27, 2019, Plaintiff Jesse Plasola, a California resident proceeding pro se but not in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to U.S.C. § 1983. (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1). The claims arise from Plaintiff’s California divorce proceedings in 2006, and, more specifically, from Plaintiff’s efforts a decade later to modify the Dissolution Order governing the division of the couple’s marital property. The Complaint sues five…