Brooke Catherine Sylvia v. Nancy A. Berryhill
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20198:19-cv-00446California6,204 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BROOKE CATHERINE S., Case No. 8:19-cv-00446-KES
Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND
v.
ORDER
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant.
I.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Brooke Catherine S. (“Plaintiff”) applied for Titles II and XVI disability benefits in October 2015 alleging disability on August 16, 2015, due to various mental disorders. Administrative Record (“AR”) 207-19, 248-58. On February 8, 2018, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) conducted a hearing at which Plaintiff, who was represented by an attorney, appeared and testified, as did a vocational expert (“VE”). AR 33-75. On March 28, 2018, the ALJ issued an
1 Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner of Social Security and is automatically substituted as a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). 28 unfavorable decision. AR 12-32. The ALJ found that Plaintiff…