Dora Alicia Penate v. A-Target, Inc. et a l

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20192:19-cv-09117California612 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 19-9117 PA (JEMx) Date November 12, 2019 Title Dora Alicia Penate v. Target Corporation

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER Before the Court is a Notice of Removal filed by defendant Target Corporation (“Defendant”). Defendant asserts that this Court has jurisdiction over the action brought against it by plaintiff Dora Alicia Penate (‘Plaintiff’) based on the Court’s diversity jurisdiction. See

U.S.C. § 1332.

Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having subject matter jurisdiction only over matters authorized by the Constitution and Congress. See, e.g., Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 377, 114 S. Ct. 1673, 1675, 128 L. Ed. 2d 391 (1994). A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.